(0) Obligation:
Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
first(0, X) → nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z)))
from(X) → cons(X, n__from(n__s(X)))
first(X1, X2) → n__first(X1, X2)
from(X) → n__from(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__first(X1, X2)) → first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__from(X)) → from(activate(X))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
(1) CpxTrsToCpxRelTrsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Transformed TRS to relative TRS where S is empty.
(2) Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
first(0, X) → nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) → cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z)))
from(X) → cons(X, n__from(n__s(X)))
first(X1, X2) → n__first(X1, X2)
from(X) → n__from(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__first(X1, X2)) → first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__from(X)) → from(activate(X))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
(3) SlicingProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Sliced the following arguments:
cons/0
(4) Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
first(0, X) → nil
first(s(X), cons(Z)) → cons(n__first(X, activate(Z)))
from(X) → cons(n__from(n__s(X)))
first(X1, X2) → n__first(X1, X2)
from(X) → n__from(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__first(X1, X2)) → first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__from(X)) → from(activate(X))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
(5) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n1):
The rewrite sequence
activate(n__first(X1, X2)) →+ first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [X1 / n__first(X1, X2)].
The result substitution is [ ].
(6) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)